Amneal Loses Bid For 180-Day Generic Exclusivity On Namenda XR
Executive Summary
US FDA's demand for commercial-scale data for memantine extended-release during ANDA review did not amount to change in 'requirements for approval,' judge rules, upholding agency determination that Amneal forfeited marketing exclusivity for failure to obtained tentative approval within 30 months.
You may also be interested in...
Pediatric Exclusivity: Court Backs US On When Studies 'Fairly Respond' To Requests
However, FDA must explain why denial of Sensipar's pediatric exclusivity was consistent with exclusivity award for J&J's Ortho Tri-Cyclen, US judge says. In swipe at plaintiff Amgen, court says pediatric study reports themselves guide exclusivity determinations, not the amount of effort a sponsor puts into those studies.
Generic Exclusivity Suit Says US FDA Can’t Deny Prize If It Asks For Extra Data
Amneal’s Namenda XR lawsuit asserts FDA’s determination that it forfeited 180-day marketing exclusivity on memantine extended-release generics ignores delays resulting from agency’s unexpected request for data from commercial-size lots.
CellTrans’ Donislecel Gets US FDA Panel Nod For Small Group Of Type 1 Diabetics
Benefits of independence from exogenous insulin outweighed the risks from long-term immunosuppression necessary with the allogeneic pancreatic islet cellular therapy, majority of panelists said, but they urged the FDA to limit the indication to a very small subpopulation of patients.