AAM Fails In Bid To Block California Pay-For-Delay Law
AAM Fails To Prove “Concrete Harm” To Member Companies
As the AAM failed to demonstrate a “concrete or imminent” injury to its member companies, a US appeals court has rejected the agency’s challenge to the Californian law banning “pay-for-delay” deals.
You may also be interested in...
AAM Succeeds As California Court Temporarily Blocks Pay-For-Delay Law
A judge in California has agreed to instate a temporary injunction against a state law designed to curb so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ deals, handing victory to generics and biosimilars industry association the AAM.
Timeline Set For Latest AAM California Challenge
A court timeline has been set out for the latest attack by the AAM on Californian legislation that deems “pay-for-delay” litigation settlement deals anticompetitive.
AAM Appeals Over California Pay-For-Delay Law
Responding to a California district court’s denial of an injunction to prevent the enactment of the US state’s legislation banning ‘pay-for-delay’ settlement deals, the AAM has confirmed plans to immediately appeal the decision.