Jury Sides With Endo And Impax On 2014 Opana Antitrust Suit
Opana ER Purchasers Claimed $102m Endo Payment ‘Effectively Guaranteed’
Executive Summary
Endo and Impax have received a favorable jury verdict after a 2010 patent-litigation settlement between the pair over Endo’s Opana ER was alleged to have been “an anticompetitive scheme that restrained competition,”
You may also be interested in...
FTC v. Endo: Exclusive Licenses, ‘Supracompetitive Prices’ Are Protected By Patent Laws
In an unsealed redacted opinion dismissing FTC’s complaint, district judge says Endo’s agreement with Impax, which left it the sole marketer of oxymorphone ER, falls within the bounds of anticompetitive activity protected by patent laws.
Five Big Legal Stories From 2022
Generics Bulletin looks back at a selection of the most significant legal stories from 2022, including a major victory in the UK on the Eliquis blood thinner giant and continued action on generic label carve outs, which has the potential to reverberate through the US industry.
Teva-MedinCell Alliance Heats Up With Second Phase III Trial Underway
Teva’s partnership with MedinCell for long-acting injectable products, first penned a decade ago, is beginning to gather steam, as another candidate entered the clinic ahead of a potential first approval in the coming months.